...as young as we're ever going to get...

?
Always earnest, almost never serious, I do not enjoy long walks on the beach or any of that nonsense... I do enjoy good and/or good-looking people, black coffee, margaritas, midnight onwards, hectic cities, philosophy & chatting throw-away metaphysics, &c... I'm more left-wing than I should be, more abstractedly-minded than I should be, more averse to forwards-planning than I should be - at least, if I wanted to 'get anything done in this world'. But since I don't actually want to get anything of that sort done, I'm good.
My life is surreal - like if Kafka and Hunter S. Thompson got together and took a road-trip to Disneyland...

It would be nice to see how many homophobic people happy to flash any D&G products they own would be willing to wear this? Or is there something of a ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ policy at work here also? Potential act of defiance against a culture that insists people self-efface: wearing clothing with assertive statements in massive lettering on the front. And this is where clothing as a means of self-expression comes into its own. The opposite of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ thinking has to be simply choosing to walk down the street dressed like this, silently showing the people passing by these basic truths, without waiting for them to ask before you can tell them gay people exist.

It would be nice to see how many homophobic people happy to flash any D&G products they own would be willing to wear this? Or is there something of a ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ policy at work here also? Potential act of defiance against a culture that insists people self-efface: wearing clothing with assertive statements in massive lettering on the front. And this is where clothing as a means of self-expression comes into its own. The opposite of ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ thinking has to be simply choosing to walk down the street dressed like this, silently showing the people passing by these basic truths, without waiting for them to ask before you can tell them gay people exist.

From a New York Times article about the possible repeal of the US military’s ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy

[…] both opponents and supporters of the ban say a host of thorny practical questions will face the Pentagon if Congress gives final approval to legislation allowing the repeal of the ban, which could happen this summer.

Will openly gay service members be placed in separate housing, as the commandant of the Marine Corps has advocated? What benefits, if any, will partners or spouses of homosexual service members be accorded? Will all military units be required to treat homosexuals the same? And what training will heterosexual officers and enlisted troops receive to prepare them to serve with openly gay soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines?

The very fact that paragraphs like this have to be written either breaks my heart or makes me want to laugh in disbelief. Basic answer to all these questions? Service members will just have to grow up. With the issue of separate housing - well in American universities don’t predominately heterosexual male and female student bodies live in the same housing? If you can let heavily-drinking young college students share dorms and rooms, even when the possibility exists that these are types who could (shock horror) be attracted to those living around them, can you not let your grown service members share housing? And as to that incredible question of ‘what training will heterosexual officers and enlisted troops receive to prepare them…’ - I wasn’t aware that troops now needed specific training to prepare them to be decent human beings. How can a person ask what training they will get to learn - to be respectful, to be accepting, to be open-minded and intelligent - should that not be the sort of thing they are taught by their parents, or in their schools, long before they’re old enough to enlist? What training have gay men and women ever received to prepare them to live and work with openly homophobic peers? These priorities are so warped they make my head spin.

Elaine Donnelly, a leading supporter of the ban on homosexuals serving openly, said she expected major fights over housing issues, including whether gay couples should be allowed to live together on bases, as married heterosexual couples are. “Same-sex couples in family housing will become a reason for families to decline re-enlistment or a change in station,” she said.

Ms. Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, a nonprofit policy group, also predicted fierce debate over rules governing antidiscrimination policies toward homosexuals. She said she and other supporters of the ban worried that service members who oppose homosexuality on religious grounds would be denied promotions, a policy she called “zero tolerance” toward anti-gay discrimination.

First paragraph: so the reason people will decline to re-enlist in the military is not because their families are forced to live a lifestyle that drags them round from base to base, or they have to serve long terms away from their loved-ones, or even the fact that they might get blown up, shot, etc. - but because good god there’s a gay couple living next-door? Enemy car-bombs are nothing compared to the threat of Tegan and Sarah being audible over the fence from the neighbour’s back-garden in the summer months, is that right?

And second paragraph: well I just can’t begin to fathom how a person can be critical of the idea of zero tolerance towards anti-gay discrimination. And what priorities again - the fact that gay men and women are discharged from the military for being openly gay (as 13,000 have indeed been since 1993) is not her concern - her concern is that, if this rule changed, people who wanted to discriminate against gay people would possibly be denied promotion. It ultimately doesn’t matter whether a person’s anti-gay discrimination is on religious grounds or not: if you want to operate within and receive the rewards of being within any supposedly-decent body, be that the military, a country, a company, then you have to sign up to be a half-decent human-being towards the other human-beings involved. The rule should not be either keep secretly gay or you’re not wanted, but either learn to live with others in a compassionate way regardless of your personal prejudices or you’re not wanted. Those are the people you want discharged from your military, surely - not those with tendencies to fall in love with the same sex, but those with tendencies to treat their other human comrades so terribly.

Misfits series two rehearsal
The sight of this makes me so happy. It’s been too long since season one.

Misfits series two rehearsal

The sight of this makes me so happy. It’s been too long since season one.

[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

The Trillion Dollar campaign for The Zimbabwean newspaper which did brilliantly at last night’s D&AD Awards, and won South Africa’s first Black Pencil (i.e. the top prize possible). This is the kind of genius that reinforces my admiration for the advertising world - because when advertising is good, it is really good. So many of the nominees/winners from the Awards are fantastic, but certainly worth checking out are the Australian ‘Best Job in the World’ campaign (likewise the first Australian Black Pencil won) and this video also, which would lose something of its force if I said what exactly it’s ‘about’ beforehand.

Continuing the Mancunophile theme, Lowry’s rendering of Piccadilly Gardens.
Again, I can’t look at this without my first thought being ‘oh look, that’s where Burger King is’.

Continuing the Mancunophile theme, Lowry’s rendering of Piccadilly Gardens.

Again, I can’t look at this without my first thought being ‘oh look, that’s where Burger King is’.

Oxford Road, Manchester, by Valette, 1910
Impressionism’s ability to make our smoke-filled factory-stacked industrial revolution cities beautiful is incredible. And these images of Manchester a century ago do make me happy - I can’t look at this image without trying to work out where Spar would be…

Oxford Road, Manchester, by Valette, 1910

Impressionism’s ability to make our smoke-filled factory-stacked industrial revolution cities beautiful is incredible. And these images of Manchester a century ago do make me happy - I can’t look at this image without trying to work out where Spar would be…

I swear one of the most questionable things about this is that it seems to make no distinctions between levels of supposed evils - with that layout ’baby killers’ seem on par with ‘sports nuts’. Also ‘atheists’ is so much smaller than ‘sports nuts’, while here I was thinking any god would have more issue with those of us who actively denied his existence than those who subscribed to ESPN. And then ’child molesting homosexuals’ [because all those gosh darn heterosexual paedophiles are just too straight to hate?] are as bad as ‘money lovers’? Really now?
This makes me want to create my own sandwich board, warning that my personal judgement is coming, and targeting the people who, though I can’t be misanthropic enough to build even hypothetical hells, would at least be sent to inhabit the regions of my heavens that didn’t have air-con. I’m going to start scribbling warnings then to
CROCS-WEARERSDRIVERS WHO DON’T STOP AT ZEBRA CROSSINGSANY-PHOBES‘EVERYBODY LOVES RAYMOND’ FANSAPPLE CUSTOMERS WHO QUEUE UP OVERNIGHT TO BUY IPADSRIGHT-WINGERSRUDE BUS DRIVERSPEOPLE WHO WEAR SANDWICH BOARDS
And then I will wear this sandwich board around town.
But I like the fact that it warns his judgement is coming but doesn’t specifically say how these particular types will be judged - yes it’s perhaps implied but that leaves room open for imagining a scenario in which God turns up for his rapture, rounds up all the sports nuts, atheists, rebellious women, drunkards, and pot smoking little devils - and has a wild night in watching the basketball. Because that sounds like my kind of judgement day and now that sandwich board has only got my hopes up.

I swear one of the most questionable things about this is that it seems to make no distinctions between levels of supposed evils - with that layout ’baby killers’ seem on par with ‘sports nuts’. Also ‘atheists’ is so much smaller than ‘sports nuts’, while here I was thinking any god would have more issue with those of us who actively denied his existence than those who subscribed to ESPN. And then ’child molesting homosexuals’ [because all those gosh darn heterosexual paedophiles are just too straight to hate?] are as bad as ‘money lovers’? Really now?

This makes me want to create my own sandwich board, warning that my personal judgement is coming, and targeting the people who, though I can’t be misanthropic enough to build even hypothetical hells, would at least be sent to inhabit the regions of my heavens that didn’t have air-con. I’m going to start scribbling warnings then to

CROCS-WEARERS
DRIVERS WHO DON’T STOP AT ZEBRA CROSSINGS
ANY-PHOBES
‘EVERYBODY LOVES RAYMOND’ FANS
APPLE CUSTOMERS WHO QUEUE UP OVERNIGHT TO BUY IPADS
RIGHT-WINGERS
RUDE BUS DRIVERS
PEOPLE WHO WEAR SANDWICH BOARDS

And then I will wear this sandwich board around town.

But I like the fact that it warns his judgement is coming but doesn’t specifically say how these particular types will be judged - yes it’s perhaps implied but that leaves room open for imagining a scenario in which God turns up for his rapture, rounds up all the sports nuts, atheists, rebellious women, drunkards, and pot smoking little devils - and has a wild night in watching the basketball. Because that sounds like my kind of judgement day and now that sandwich board has only got my hopes up.